
For some reason, there seems to be an assumption that a Democratic President could not lead our country during a war as well as a Republican. The GOP has painted itself with warpaint, decrying the Democrats would be "weak" in pursuing the war on terror. Step back a moment. Almost every war in the 20th century was conducted with a Democrat in the White House: WWI--Woodrow Wilson; WWII--Franklin Roosevelt; Korea--Harry Truman; Vietnam--Lyndon Johnson. Only during the final years of Vietnam and the first Gulf War was the president a Republican. So why do people seem to believe that a Democratic President would be any worse than a Republican as Commander in Chief? Hogwash.






















